The roadmap can't see revenue
You prioritise by what's loudest in the backlog, because the number that would settle the argument, what these accounts actually pay, lives in a different tool.
Try it
Product management where
the roadmap can see revenue.
The request sits in one tool. The revenue sits in another. Nothing joins them. AIOProductOS joins them on one record, and the roadmap, the backlog, customer feedback and product analytics all read from it. Flat from $199/mo, every module included, never per seat.
Demo needs no signup, no card and no call. It's read-only, and it's the same app customers use.
The problem
When a customer asks for something, where does it end up?
And when you decide whether to build it, do you know what that customer pays you? Most product teams can answer the first and not the second, because their tools don't work together, they sync. A tracker holds the work. An analytics tool holds the behaviour. A feedback inbox holds the requests. Billing holds the money. Four systems, four ideas of who the customer is, and a person in the middle copying between them.
Feedback dies in a silo
Requests arrive in support, sales calls, surveys and reviews. Nothing links them to a feature, so the same request gets counted once and forgotten four times.
Shipping proves nothing
The release goes out, the metric moves, and no record connects the two. So next quarter's plan is built on memory rather than outcomes.
What it is
One customer record, and everything hangs off it
Not another tool beside the others. The spine underneath them. Every module below reads and writes the same record, which is why a question like 'which paying accounts are waiting on this?' has an answer instead of a spreadsheet.
One record per customer
Account 360: revenue, feedback, meetings and contacts on one page, with users matched to their account by email domain. The record every other module reads from.
Revenue-aware roadmap
Every task carries the customer's plan and revenue. Features rank by request count and revenue at stake, scored with RICE, WSJF, Value-Effort, MoSCoW or Kano, whichever your team already runs.
Methodology-aware boards
One board renders Scrum, Shape Up, Waterfall or an experiment board, per product. You don't rebuild your process to fit the tool.
Customer feedback, joined
One feed across reviews, requests, surveys, designs and support, each item linked to a feature and an account. NPS and CSAT micro-surveys, with NPS revenue-weighted.
Product analytics built in
Revenue-weighted funnels and retention, session replay and feature flags on the same spine as the roadmap, so a metric move and the release that caused it sit on one record.
AI teammates over MCP
Named agents hold real seats with role-scoped permissions and act on typed spine records. Any MCP-capable assistant can read the whole product spine, not one tool at a time.
Every module is on every tier. No module is plan-gated: the only limits are seats and AI agents. See the full product or the MCP server.
Connected, not consolidated
You don't have to throw away your stack
'Replaces your tools' and 'works with your tools' are each half true, and either one alone misdescribes this. What it replaces is the stitching: the standing manual work of keeping four systems agreeing about one customer.
Move that work onto AIOProductOS outright, or keep every tool you have: 100+ connectors land them on one shared record either way. The unit of consolidation is the record, not the tool set.
Pricing
Flat by tier. Adding a teammate doesn't change the bill.
Per-seat pricing taxes you for growing. Every plan here is flat, every module is included, and AI is never metered by credits or tokens.
| Plan | Price | Members | Products | AI agents |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Start | $199/mo | 5 | 1 | 2 |
| Team | $399/mo | 20 | 3 | 5 |
| Business | $899/mo | 75 | 10 | 15 |
Every module on every tier · SSO/SAML and audit log on Business · yearly is ten months for twelve · extra agent seats $29. A card-required 14-day onboarding runway before you're charged, then 30 days to get your money back.
When it isn't for you
Three reasons to pick something else
Fit decides this, not enthusiasm. Three cases where another tool is the better buy, and we would rather you knew now than in month two.
- Jira is the right call if you need the deepest issue tracker on the market and have admins to configure it. Our comparison pages say so in detail.
- A point tool is the right call if you want a single-purpose feedback inbox or roadmap app and nothing else. It will be simpler and cheaper at that one job.
- Something else is the right call for procurement-led enterprise buying, a sales-org CRM need, or a data-warehouse/BI project. This is built for product teams of 5-50.
Questions
What people ask before trying it
What is a product operating system?
A product operating system (ProductOS) is one product that does the job of a whole stack of point tools (analytics, issue tracking, customer feedback, roadmap) by joining them on a single shared record per customer, rather than syncing fields between separate silos. AIOProductOS is an AI product management platform built that way: the feature, the customer who asked for it, what they pay, and the code that shipped it all live on one record.
How is this different from product management software like Jira or Productboard?
A tracker like Jira or Linear manages the work: issues, sprints, status. A discovery suite like Productboard or Aha! manages the roadmap and the feedback above it. Both are good at their slice, and you connect them to a third system for the revenue. AIOProductOS joins all of it on one customer record, so prioritization runs on who is actually paying rather than what is loudest in the backlog. When a point tool genuinely fits better, our comparison pages say so.
Which product tools actually work together?
Most don't. They sync fields between silos, which is why teams end up copying data between a tracker, an analytics tool and a feedback inbox. AIOProductOS takes the other approach: 100+ connectors pull from the tools you already use and land them on one shared customer record. Connected, not consolidated. You keep your stack, and the product record finally holds together.
How much does AIOProductOS cost?
Flat by tier, never per seat: Start $199/mo (5 members, 1 product, 2 AI agents), Team $399/mo (20 members, 3 products, 5 AI agents), Business $899/mo (75 members, 10 products, 15 AI agents, SSO/SAML, audit log). Every module is included on every tier, no module is plan-gated, and AI is never credit-metered. Yearly is ten months for twelve.
Can I try AIOProductOS before paying?
There's no free tier. Every plan starts with a card-required 14-day onboarding runway before you're charged, and a 30-day money-back window after that. If you want to see the product before any of that, the demo is a live read-only copy of the real app on a populated dataset: no signup, no form, no call.
Can my AI assistant read our product data?
Yes. AIOProductOS ships a hosted MCP server with 71 tools that exposes the whole product spine (customers, revenue, feedback, work and code) to any MCP-capable assistant. Most product MCP servers wrap a single tool, so an assistant can read your tracker but can't tell you which customer asked or what they pay. Reading across the spine is the difference.
Not today?
Then take the short version instead
Leave an email and you get one reply, written by a person: what this would replace in a stack like yours, what it actually costs at your team size, and a straight answer on where it is the wrong call. If it is not a fit we will say so - that is a cheaper outcome for both of us than a trial nobody finishes.
Seen enough?
Open the real app before you decide anything
It's a live read-only copy on a populated dataset: write actions off, everything else exactly as a customer sees it. Start on a customer record. That's where the argument either lands or it doesn't.